The Curse of Ham is a theological idea that has been used throughout history in attempts to explain slavery, racial distinctions, and even racial hierarchy. But what does the biblical text actually say?
In this episode of Conversations That Matter, Jon Harris examines Genesis 9 and the historical interpretations surrounding Ham and Canaan. Was Ham actually cursed? What was Ham’s sin? Does the text support the increasingly popular maternal incest theory? Why was Canaan cursed instead of Ham? And when did the idea emerge that the Curse of Ham applied to African peoples?
We examine the biblical text, early Jewish and Christian interpretations, church history, and the later development of racial applications of this passage.
The goal is not to force modern political concerns into Scripture, but to understand Genesis on its own terms and examine the historical record honestly.
00:00 The Curse of Ham Theology Is Back
05:20 What Does Genesis 9 Actually Say?
13:55 The Maternal Incest Theory Examined
19:12 Why Was Canaan Cursed Instead of Ham?
28:30 How Jewish and Christian Writers Interpreted the Curse
35:40 When Did the Curse Become Connected to Black Skin?
39:30 The Curse of Ham and African Slavery
45:00 Modern Race and Biblical Interpretation
52:00 The Prophetic Meaning of Noah’s Blessings and Curse
59:00 What Did Calvin and Other Theologians Actually Believe?
Jon’s Music: jonharristunes.com
To Support the Podcast:
Support
Become a Patron
https://www.patreon.com/jonharrispodcast
Substack: https://substack.com/@jonharris
Follow Jon on Twitter: https://twitter.com/jonharris1989
Follow Jon on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/jonharris1989/
Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/conversations-that-matter8971/donations
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy